Junto Roundtable on Atlantic Archives

When I originally envisioned The Junto Blog, I wanted it to be a place where junior academics could come and share research tales, archival experiences, disciplinary thoughts, and other fun-but-important aspects of academic life. The tone, as I told the first contributors, was to be an engaged but informal discussion at a lunch table. To say the blog’s exceeded my expectations would be an understatement. As one example of the excellent work they’ve done, here’s a roundtable from last week on tips and advice for researching at various archives across the Atlantic world:

In case you missed them, I strongly recommend bookmarking these pages for future reference.

Kristine Haglund on BYU’s Rape Culture

Nearly two months ago, By Common Consent posted a recap of a rape awareness meeting that took place at BYU where university administrators admitted that they investigate students who report rape for possible honor code violations. (“We do not apologize,” she said, for holding students to a particular standard.) The implication being that many assume women who are raped often participated in dangerous activities that placed them in that situation. The Salt Lake Tribune then performed some excellent reporting on BYU’s serious problem with rape reporting (see here, here, here, and here), based on the reports of brave BYU students who stepped forward. This is a serious issue not too dissimilar from what is taken place throughout American campuses, though with a unique spin given BYU’s honor code practice. There has been a lot of commentary on it–I’ve went on several twitter rants proclaiming my absolute disgust for this BYU practice regarding rape victims)–but we were still in need of a calm, sober, and far-reaching analysis telling us what this meant.

Kristine Haglund, former editor of Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought and one of Mormonism’s most adept analysts and writers, wrote such an analysis for the consistently-excellent magazine, Religion and Politics: “At BYU, A New Confrontation in the Campus Sexual Assaults Debate.” This is a must-read for anyone who is interested in Mormonism, conservative religious cultures, or rape policies at America’s universities.

The essay covers the differences and tensions between civil and religious law, the dangers of purity culture, the problems of cultural assumptions regarding gender and sexuality, and even the importance of including religious voices in national debates over Title IX. A highlight:

The beliefs that inform religious “purity culture” are not, in the end, so far removed from what is called “rape culture” in supposedly secular America. Confronting the ideas about virginity, modesty, and the varieties of male and female desire, made explicit in religious terms on some campuses, provides an opportunity to seriously examine similar lingering and often unspoken views that govern the expression of sexuality elsewhere.

Also:

Religious codes of conduct do not accomplish all of these goals any more than secular university policies and civil laws do—indeed, as the BYU example demonstrates, sometimes they get it dangerously, egregiously wrong. Nonetheless, believers who aspire to live demanding ideals are practiced in thinking about sex as a morally serious act. They should be at the table when we talk about how to help young people. Simply exempting religious colleges from the requirements of Title IX, and thereby excluding them from the discussion eliminates their potential contributions, and it also means that they do not hear salient and necessary criticisms of their policies. It is a loss for both sides.

Kinder Institute’s Shawnee Trail Conference

Last weekend I attended my last Kinder Institute event of my postdoctoral tenure: the Shawnee Trail Conference. You can read the program at this link; it was a mixture of history and political science papers, and the participants ranged from doctoral students to tenured professors. We even had a lunch-time presentation by Andrew Porwancher on his recently published book. (Frankly, I wish we could have heard about his current project, on Alexander Hamilton’s secret Jewish life.)

Shawnee Group

The group of presenters at the Shawnee Conference. It wasn’t very, um, diverse.

The conference was a reaffirmation of much of what I learned these last two years at the Kinder Institute: history and political science are very, very different fields. I mean, I learned a lot from the papers, and they were even interesting, but they are just framed around different questions and responding to different concerns. (I even tweeted about this at the time.) Now, it’s important to continue trying to reach across disciplinary boundaries–which I hope to do even after my Kinder stage–but it is a reminder of how much our scholarly contexts shape the way we look at our subjects.

George Washington’s Secret Mormon Life

A couple weeks ago I wrote about a recent and laughable book that claims George Washington was a proto-Mormon. (See the post here.) Given the echo chamber that is my social network, most of the readers and responders agreed with me that the books’ claims are silly, though I hope it was clear that I think there’s an important cultural tension beneath that silly surface. Anyway, there were a few commenters at the end of the thread (and a few on social media) who asked me to actually engage the book’s arguments rather than dismiss them. I’d respond by saying 1) I’m lazy, and 2) there are literally two centuries of scholarship that this author ignores, so I’ll just rely on them. Anyway, Ardis Parshall is a much more patient and thorough historian than I am, so she did an excellent take-down of one of the Washington claims at her blog, Keepapitchinin. (See here.) Here’s a good summary:

Provenance, people. Provenance matters.

Basic honesty matters, too. You damage the Latter-day Saint cause by promulgating unsupportable nonsense like this. What non-Mormon with a modicum of sense is going to listen to missionaries tell about Moroni visiting Joseph Smith, after this? What are you doing to the future faith of Latter-day Saints who think they feel the Spirit testifying to this thrilling nonsense but who later find out how unworthy it is? How likely are they to trust their impressions the next time?

By the way, if you are interested in Mormon history–or, really, history in general–you should be a frequenter of Ardis’s blog.

Sadly, it is evident Deseret Book is still going to promote this book at all costs, which will further devalue their credibility as a publisher. A shame.

Also, the image for this post comes from my old pal, Jon McNaughton (see here), and depicts the same problematic theme. That guy’s the best.

New Books in Mormon History

The last two weeks saw four excellent new books in Mormon history, two each from University of Utah and Signature, arrive that deserve attention. I’ll probably have brief overviews of them sometime soon, but at the moment I’ll just highlight their titles and summaries:

Women and MormonismKate Holbrook and Matthew Bowman, Women and Mormonism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (University of Utah Press). There are a lot of edited collections out there, especially in Mormon history, but a majority of them fall by the wayside within a year or two, never to be heard from again. (There’s a reason most academic presses are turning away from multi-author volumes, save for rare exceptions.) Yet this is one edited collection that I really think will stick–its collection of authors, diversity of disciplines, and coverage of topics make it a crucial book for anyone interested in Mormon women’s history. I’d venture to say it’s the most important multi-author work on the topic since the famous Women and Authority in 1992. I’ve only read about half of the chapters thus far, but they have all been excellent. I was also in attendance for the conference upon which this volume is based and can attest to the energy and excitement that was involved.

DirectionsSpeaking of multi-author volumes, Patrick Mason, ed., Directions for Mormon Studies in the Twenty-First Century (University of Utah), is also the result of a conference. This event was a festschrift in honor of Armand Mauss, one of the great scholars of Mormon history, and it takes a multi-disciplinary look at the future of the field. While history has long been the premier discipline within the subfield of Mormon studies, it has long been hoped that new approaches would be quickly added. The papers in this volume point to a number of possibilities, including with sociology, autobiography, and ethnography. Still heavily history, of course, but at least hints to a non-history-centric focus. It reminds me of Quincy Newell and Eric Mason’s New Perspectives in Mormon Studies: Creating and Crossing Boundaries (University of Oklahoma Press, 2013), which performed a similar work. The two volumes compliment each other in nice ways.

GloriousFinally, Signature Books offered two new volumes. The first, Island Adventures: The Hawaiian Mission of Francis A. Hammond, 1851-1865, edited by John Hammond, offers an acute overview of an important early missionary focus; I’ve had an ARC of the volume sitting on my desk for a month, and the few times I’ve dove in have rewarded me with rich textual excerpts. I look forward to more exploration. The other one is a book long-awaited in MHA’s community: Martha Bradley-Evans’s Nauvoo-era biographical study of Joseph Smith, Glorious in Persecution: Joseph Smith, American Prophet. Part of a trilogy Smith-Pettitt commissioned quite some time ago, it is the first of the three parts to appear. (The Van Wagoner, Natural Born Seer, which covers Smith’s life through 1830, will appear in a couple months.) I’ve already given Glorious in Persecution a quick read-through, and am now giving it a much deeper look since it overlaps with my current Nauvoo project. I’ll probably write a more in-depth review of it later, but there are a lot of things I love in it (her theoretical approach to Smith is long over-due and provocative) and a few frustrations (her reliance on problematic sources and lack of engagement with recent scholarship). A must-read, though, for those interested in the Nauvoo period.